Al Quada's number 3 man has been killed - again - Page 2

Think for myself · 01-31-2008, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justoneman

So invade Pakistan. You have to invade Pakistan if Mushariff does not give permission to enter. Are you advocating invading Pakistan over the objections of the government there?

Spin doctor now?

If there exists credible evidence that a group of AQ was hiding in the hills of Pakistan, I strongly advocate sending in the appropriate troop levels to ensure the demise of said group.

Has Pakistan demonstrated a commitment to rooting out terrorists in it's country? Not in the least.

Common Sense Craig · 01-31-2008, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justoneman

So invade Pakistan. You have to invade Pakistan if Mushariff does not give permission to enter. Are you advocating invading Pakistan over the objections of the government there?

You're funny. So invading Iraq was just the right thing to do eventhough Pakistan would have been a more obvious target?! Still got the propaganda spinning around inside of you, I see.

justoneman · 01-31-2008, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Think for myself

Spin doctor now?

If there exists credible evidence that a group of AQ was hiding in the hills of Pakistan, I strongly advocate sending in the appropriate troop levels to ensure the demise of said group.

Has Pakistan demonstrated a commitment to rooting out terrorists in it's country? Not in the least.

So what? We do not invade countries because they do not police their country properly. Now if you can prove Pakistan was advocating on behalf of Al Qaieda, that would be different.

Common Sense Craig · 01-31-2008, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Think for myself

Spin doctor now?

If there exists credible evidence that a group of AQ was hiding in the hills of Pakistan, I strongly advocate sending in the appropriate troop levels to ensure the demise of said group.

Has Pakistan demonstrated a commitment to rooting out terrorists in it's country? Not in the least.

I think that they have demonstrated that they root FOR terrorists, (not to mention funding them, too), in their country and surrounding countries.....

Common Sense Craig · 01-31-2008, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justoneman

So what? We do not invade countries because they do not police their country properly. Now if you can prove Pakistan was advocating on behalf of Al Qaieda, that would be different.

Aaaaaaannnnnddd now we're back to that new "age old" question: When in the hell was Iraq a threat to us and the world and for world-wide terrorism, for that matter?

Think for myself · 01-31-2008, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justoneman

So what? We do not invade countries because they do not police their country properly.

Now that is some seriously funny stuff. When did we make up this rule?

On the flip side, are you suggesting the murderer of over 3,000 Americans go free because we don't want to offend anyone?

justoneman · 01-31-2008, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Common Sense Craig

Aaaaaaannnnnddd now we're back to that new "age old" question: When in the hell was Iraq a threat to us and the world and for world-wide terrorism, for that matter?

They lost a war called the gulf war to us. They had to adhere to weapons inspections failed to do so properly. They also attacked us in the no fly zone. But you know this.

Think for myself · 01-31-2008, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justoneman

They lost a war called the gulf war to us. They had to adhere to weapons inspections failed to do so properly. They also attacked us in the no fly zone. But you know this.

They surrendered under a UN accord, not us.

justoneman · 01-31-2008, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Think for myself

They surrendered under a UN accord, not us.

TFM!! You have made a good one there!! Very funny stuff.

Latherty · 01-31-2008, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BiRdo

Apparently he was a connection between the Taliban and al-Qaida, and replacing his position would be harder than other al-Qaida positions.

Better than not having him gone at all. I don't get what some people expect, the entire dismantling of al-Qaida with the snap of Bush's fingers?

I don't know if their deaths attract more volunteers or not. I can imagine the avangence culture is strong amongst al Qaida recruits...

Whether or not an individual is replaceable seems a moot point, as obviously they keep replacing them...