Quote:
Originally Posted by Boyaka
|
That article is nothing more than tripe. Its an over simplification of a long process, and the troubles the comission ran into. OF course there were problems, but nothing was compromised as that artcile tried to twist the words of the people on the comission tries to do.
YOU do know that hte commission despite its problems are fine with the conclusions they came to?
Wouldn't you think that those who were on the comission would have stopped their report from being published, or even being mentioned in the report if they disagreed or felt their investigation was "compromised"?
No one is arguing that they had problems. This is what happens when you have a body of people looking into EVERYthing the govt did and did not do concerning 911. OUR policies failed, which allowed 19 hijackers to able to commit the most horrendous crime on the USA. THey wanted answers and of course, those they were investigating didn't want to take responsibility for their failed roles to prevent 911 from happening.
THIS however, is a FAR leap to proving 911 or anything was done by "dark" forces in the US.